Skip to content

Why choose RBACX

Quick Comparison (at a glance)

Criterion RBACX (Python) Casbin (Python) Oso (Polar + Python SDK) Django Guardian django-rules Flask-RBAC
Policy definition JSON/YAML/Python dicts (declarative data + operators) Separate model.conf + policy storage (CSV/DB/etc.) Separate .polar files; declarative DSL No DSL; permissions stored in DB; backend checks No DSL; rules/predicates registered in Python In-code decorators/config registering role rules
Framework integration Adapters for FastAPI, Flask, Django/DRF, Starlette/Litestar (middleware/deps/decorators) Library calls (enforcer.enforce(...)); framework glue typically user-built Enforce via authorize() in app code; ORM filtering helpers Django-only; integrates with user.has_perm and Django Admin Django-only backend; integrates with has_perm & DRF helpers Flask-only; extension + decorators
Query-time filtering Manual in app/repo layer Manual or custom helpers Helpers like authorized_query / authorized_resources for ORMs ORM patterns (filter by permissions) Manual (apply predicates or integrate with queryset logic) N/A (endpoint/role checks)
Language scope Python Multi-language ecosystem Libraries for multiple languages Python/Django Python/Django Python/Flask

Advantages of RBACX

RBACX brings together role-based and attribute-based access control. You can start with simple role checks and add attribute-based conditions later—without changing libraries or architecture. Many alternatives focus either on roles (e.g., Flask-RBAC, Casbin in its simplest use) or attributes (e.g., Oso, rules), whereas RBACX supports both approaches from the start.

  • Straightforward policy format
    Policies are JSON/YAML (or Python dicts). Unlike Casbin (separate model + data) or Oso (a dedicated language), RBACX uses familiar configuration formats that non-programmers can review with care. The condition DSL is intentionally compact but sufficiently expressive for common business rules. For example:

    {"==": [ {"attr": "resource.owner"}, {"attr": "subject.id"} ]}
    makes the “owner” check explicit. In Polar, the equivalent resource.owner == user is shorter but requires context on objects and language semantics. RBACX policies are easy to version and to send for security review.

  • Clean, extensible codebase
    RBACX is modular and easy to customize. If you want to store policies in PostgreSQL, implement a PostgresPolicySource and plug it into Guard—no need to fork or patch the library. Casbin is also extensible but has a steeper API/model learning curve; Oso’s engine is not designed for user-level engine extensions. RBACX is pure Python, so teams can audit, extend, or patch it directly. Code readability makes maintenance and debugging simpler.

  • Adapters for multiple frameworks
    Out of the box, RBACX provides adapters for FastAPI/Starlette, Flask, Django, and Litestar. This shortens integration time and enables the same authorization model across services built with different frameworks. In contrast, some alternatives are tied to one framework (Guardian → Django, Flask‑RBAC → Flask) or require custom glue code (Casbin, Oso).

  • Hot policy reload
    RBACX can watch file/HTTP/S3 sources and apply policy updates automatically using ETag checks. This suits dynamic environments where policies are frequently modified or centrally stored (e.g., S3). Guardian, rules, and Flask‑RBAC do not provide this out of the box; Casbin partially covers it (manual reload/watchers), while Oso library generally requires programmatic reloads.

  • Explainability and obligations
    RBACX decisions expose not only Permit/Deny but also why (e.g., reason, rule_id) and can include obligations (e.g., require MFA). Explainability aids debugging and audits. Competing libraries may not offer obligations in their open-source variants or return only a boolean decision.

  • Lightweight with minimal dependencies
    RBACX keeps the dependency footprint small (e.g., jsonschema for policy validation). A smaller footprint simplifies installation and reduces exposure to third‑party vulnerabilities.

Verdict

RBACX delivers RBAC+ABAC with a declarative JSON policy model, secure defaults, combining algorithms, hot reload, explainable decisions, and ready-to-use adapters for major Python web frameworks. It’s a pragmatic choice for teams that want fine-grained, auditable authorization without adopting a new policy language.

Disclaimer: This page reflects the library author’s perspective. For projects that require 100% reliability proven by years of production use, the choice may lean toward more mature and widely adopted solutions.